Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | depian | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Red Deck Wins | latorretta | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Gruul Leyline | xenowan | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Red Deck Wins | yukiro | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Red Deck Wins | kakashi_ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Big Red , Boros Aggro , Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Boros Convoke , Boros Discover , Boros Forge , Boros Mice , Boros Monument , Boros Recommission
Meta Performance Analysis
Screaming Nemesis ranks #227 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 67%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 57.0%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Screaming Nemesis is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 11.26 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.2%. Screaming Nemesis has a win rate of 68.4%, making it 1.1% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helping Hand | Sorcery | 6 | 81.3% | 3 |
| Phyrexian Dragon Engine | Artifact Creature — Phyrexian Dragon | 6 | 81.3% | 3 |
| Recommission | Sorcery | 6 | 81.3% | 3 |
| Bulwark Ox | Creature — Ox Mount | 5 | 80.0% | 3 |
| Guardian of New Benalia | Creature — Human Soldier | 5 | 77.6% | 2 |
| Bruse Tarl, Roving Rancher | Legendary Creature — Human Warrior | 6 | 77.4% | 3 |
| Quintorius Kand | Legendary Planeswalker — Quintorius | 9 | 70.1% | 4 |
| Leyline of the Void | Enchantment | 35 | 69.9% | 8 |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 8 | 69.0% | 4 |
| Monument to Endurance | Artifact | 6 | 68.0% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Screaming Nemesis than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Callous Sell-Sword | Creature — Human Soldier // Sorcery — Adventure | 2 | 5 | 81.2% | 71.6% | +9.6% |
| Into the Flood Maw | Instant | 1 | 8 | 80.6% | 72.4% | +8.2% |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 20 | 78.1% | 70.5% | +7.5% |
| Turn Inside Out | Instant | 1 | 6 | 77.8% | 71.2% | +6.6% |
| Leyline of Resonance | Enchantment | 4 | 5 | 77.8% | 71.2% | +6.5% |
| Cacophony Scamp | Creature — Phyrexian Goblin Warrior | 1 | 5 | 77.8% | 71.2% | +6.5% |
| Soul-Guide Lantern | Artifact | 1 | 9 | 75.0% | 68.7% | +6.3% |
| Surrak, Elusive Hunter | Legendary Creature — Human Warrior | 3 | 6 | 74.3% | 68.8% | +5.5% |
| Stormchaser's Talent | Enchantment — Class | 1 | 21 | 74.5% | 69.9% | +4.6% |
| Slickshot Show-Off | Creature — Bird Wizard | 2 | 22 | 76.6% | 72.8% | +3.8% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | 1884 | 91.3% | 46.5% |
| Red Deck Wins | 1321 | 97.8% | 52.5% |
| Boros Burn | 298 | 76.2% | 52.8% |
| Temur Otters | 98 | 29.2% | 41.2% |
| Gruul Delirium | 89 | 58.5% | 41.5% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.